Domain Kiting 101
"Domain Kiting", a new buzzword, has created wrinkles on forehead of many, in domain industry. A term coined by Bob Parsons, of GoDaddy fame, it refers to unfair practice of cancellation of domain registrations before expiry of five-day grace period, to receive full refund of the fee, followed by re-registration of the domain names, only to repeat the cycle again.
Kiting is a scam involving few Registrars who are able to deposit large amount of cash with Registry and then purchase plenty of domains, usually well-indexed, expired domains. Temporary web site loaded with paid advertisement links is then hosted at these domains, which receive traffic, courtesy search engines. Clicks by visitors to such sites, generates revenue for these registrars. These domains get dropped before expiry of five-day grace period to obtain full refund, only to get re-registered if potential is there. In nutshell, registration fee is never paid for, as there is cancellation before expiry of grace period, though profits are earned on these domains from traffic received during the grace period. It should be remembered that domains getting trapped in such scheme are put off the market and remain unavailable to general public, unless they break out of this vicious cycle . Growing threats of security and likelihood of criminals exploiting such a loophole for illegal gains, adds more weightage to the problem.
A simple solution to the problem is making the registration fee
non-refundable. Additionally, legislation can be passed as a
deterrent. Furthermore, ICANN could impose limits on number of domain
name cancellations permissible against numbers registered. ICANN can
also look into statistical add/drop records of registrars and initiate
inquiry. There can be
any number of solutions, but is ICANN willing to act?
Despite, efforts by many leading personalities, including Bob Parsons, the issue remain unresolved. ICANN, the board responsible for
fixing this loophole, refuses to address it, unless a Registry approaches
them through proper channel and Registries like VeriSign (controlling
.com registry) remain tight-lipped over this contentious issue. Thus,
the deafening silence over this issue is only making things worse for the
general public and genuine customers who may not be able to use domains
that relate to their business or may have to pay escalated price to
procure one from kiting registrars. A recently filed lawsuit against Dotster
is expected to touch upon this issue in court of law and we can be
optimistic about a judgement that shall be a warning to those who are
involved in this scam.